<section name="raw">
    <SEQUENTIAL>
      <record key="001" att1="001" value="LIB900220508" att2="LIB900220508">001   LIB900220508</record>
      <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field>
      <field key="050" subkey="x">Forschungsbericht</field>
      <field key="076" subkey="">Soziologie</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/ihsfo/fo117.pdf</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">knorr, karin d. - et al., individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research</field>
      <field key="uni" subkey="t">s (pdf)</field>
      <field key="100" subkey="">knorr, karin d.</field>
      <field key="104" subkey="a">mittermeir, roland</field>
      <field key="108" subkey="a">aichholzer, georg</field>
      <field key="112" subkey="a">waller, georg</field>
      <field key="331" subkey="">individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research units</field>
      <field key="335" subkey="">(revised version)</field>
      <field key="403" subkey="">1. ed.</field>
      <field key="410" subkey="">wien</field>
      <field key="412" subkey="">institut fuer hoehere studien</field>
      <field key="425" subkey="">1976, october</field>
      <field key="433" subkey="">58 pp.</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="">institut fuer hoehere studien; forschungsberichte; 117</field>
      <field key="544" subkey="">IHSFO 117</field>
      <field key="753" subkey="">summary: studies of stratification in science have increasingly accepted the idea that science is a highly stratified and elitist</field>
      <field key="sys" subkey="t">em with skewed distributions of productivity and rewards. attempts to explain the higher productivity of higher status</field>
      <field key="sci" subkey="e">ntists by pointing to their greater ease of publication as far as acceptance of their work by journals and publishers is</field>
      <field key="con" subkey="c">erned were not supported by the data in some recent studies. if status in general does not confer greater ease of publication</field>
      <field key="the" subkey="">present paper argues that position within a research organization does confer greater ease of author - or coauthorship - and</field>
      <field key="thi" subkey="s">is the major explanatory variable accounting for productivity differences within research laboratories as far as quantity of</field>
      <field key="art" subkey="i">cles (and books) is concerned. upward moves in a laboratory's formal or informal position hierarchy are associated with a</field>
      <field key="cha" subkey="n">ge of a scientist's research involvement from goal executing to goal setting functions as well as withan increasing access to</field>
      <field key="sci" subkey="e">ntific manpower and project money. goal setting tasks provide for a significant reduction of time-expenditures in research</field>
      <field key="nec" subkey="e">ssary to assure that the scientist is identified with the research results consequently, they allow for an involvement in</field>
      <field key="mor" subkey="e">research tasks than originally. equivalently, resources in scientific manpower and project money act as a multiplying</field>
      <field key="ele" subkey="m">ent as far as quantity of output is concerned. when group productivity is considered, individual publication productivity and</field>
      <field key="esp" subkey="e">cially supervisory productivity retain a major significance. additionally, size of the research unit seemingly plays a key</field>
      <field key="rol" subkey="e">: in the present data set, size tends to be negatively related to per capita group productivity, with most pronounced</field>
      <field key="rel" subkey="a">tionships occuring in academic natural science units.;</field>
    </SEQUENTIAL>
  </section>