<section name="raw">
    <SEQUENTIAL>
      <record key="001" att1="001" value="160966" att2="160966">001   160966</record>
      <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field>
      <field key="050" subkey="x">E-Paper</field>
      <field key="076" subkey="">Politikwissenschaft</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/lib/ep6.pdf</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">Treib, Oliver - et al., Modes of Governance: A Note Towards Conceptual Clarification (pdf)</field>
      <field key="100" subkey="">Treib, Oliver</field>
      <field key="103" subkey="">Department of Political Science, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria</field>
      <field key="104" subkey="a">Bähr, Holger</field>
      <field key="107" subkey="">Department of Political Science, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria</field>
      <field key="108" subkey="a">Falkner, Gerda</field>
      <field key="111" subkey="">Department of Political Science, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria</field>
      <field key="200" subkey="b">(Connecting Excellence on European Governance (CONNEX) (Ed.))</field>
      <field key="204" subkey="b">(New Modes of Governance (NewGov) (Ed.))</field>
      <field key="331" subkey="">Modes of Governance: A Note Towards Conceptual Clarification</field>
      <field key="335" subkey="">EUROGOV is funded by the EU's 6th Framework Programme, Priority 7</field>
      <field key="403" subkey="">1. Ed.</field>
      <field key="425" subkey="">2005, November</field>
      <field key="433" subkey="">22 pp.</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="">European Governance Papers; No. N-05-02</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="h">Fossum, John Erik (Ed.) ; Falkner, Gerda (Ed.) ; Scherhaufer, Patrick (Ed.) ; et al.</field>
      <field key="461" subkey="">EUROGOV</field>
      <field key="517" subkey="c">from the Table of Contents: Introduction; Definitions of Governance: Politics, Polity or Policy; Modes of Governance: An Overview</field>
      <field key="of" subkey="E">xisting Conceptions; A Two-Step Approach to Classification; A New Typology of Modes of Governance in the Policy Dimension;</field>
      <field key="Con" subkey="c">lusion and Outlook; List of References; List of Figures and Tables;</field>
      <field key="542" subkey="">1813-6826</field>
      <field key="544" subkey="">EP6</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Governance</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Policy analysis</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">European law</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Open co-ordination</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Policy</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Learning</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">National autonomy</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Interest intermediation</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Corporatism</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Pluralism</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Networks</field>
      <field key="753" subkey="">Abstract: Recently, political science has seen an intense debate about the phenomenon of "governance". The aim of this paper is</field>
      <field key="to" subkey="c">larify the basic concepts that are at the heart of this debate, notably "governance" and "modes of governance". It argues</field>
      <field key="tha" subkey="t">most contributions share a common concern for the relationship between state intervention and societal autonomy. But</field>
      <field key="dif" subkey="f">erent strands of the literature highlight different facets of this continuum. Existing understandings may be</field>
      <field key="cla" subkey="s">sifiedaccording to whether they emphasise the politics, polity or policy dimensions of governance. We use these categories to</field>
      <field key="pre" subkey="s">ent a structured overview of different dimensions of modes of governance as they may be found in the literature. In this</field>
      <field key="con" subkey="t">ext, we argue that the classification of modes of governance as "old" or "new" is of little analytical value. Some modes of</field>
      <field key="gov" subkey="e">rnance may have been relatively new in some empirical contexts. But the same governing modes may turn out to be long</field>
      <field key="est" subkey="a">blished practice in other areas. Moving from individual dimensions to systematic classification schemes and typologies of</field>
      <field key="mod" subkey="e">s of governance, the paper highlights a number of shortcomings of existing schemes and suggests an approach that could avoid</field>
      <field key="the" subkey="s">e weaknesses. As a first step in this approach, we take a closer look at different policy properties of governance and</field>
      <field key="dev" subkey="e">lop a systematic typology of four modes of governance in the policy dimension: coercion, voluntarism, targeting and framework</field>
      <field key="reg" subkey="u">lation.;</field>
    </SEQUENTIAL>
  </section>