mdmFacet
May June 2024 Jul
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
   1  2
  3  4  5  6  7  8  9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Detail

EuropeanaInformation 
Raw data [ X ]
<section name="raw">
    <SEQUENTIAL>
      <record key="001" att1="001" value="LIB911134302" att2="LIB911134302">001   LIB911134302</record>
      <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field>
      <field key="050" subkey="x">Forschungsbericht</field>
      <field key="076" subkey="">Ökonomie</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/tec/te-11.pdf</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">Obersteiner, Michael - et al., Determinants of Long-term Economic Development: An Empirical Cross-country Study Involving Rough</field>
      <field key="Set" subkey="s">Theory and Rule Induction (pdf)</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://ideas.repec.org/p/ihs/ihstep/11.html</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">Institute for Advanced Studies. Transition Economics Series; 11 (RePEc)</field>
      <field key="100" subkey="">Obersteiner, Michael</field>
      <field key="103" subkey="">Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria</field>
      <field key="104" subkey="a">Wilk, Szymon</field>
      <field key="107" subkey="">International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)</field>
      <field key="331" subkey="">Determinants of Long-term Economic Development: An Empirical Cross-country Study Involving Rough Sets Theory and Rule Induction</field>
      <field key="403" subkey="">1. Ed.</field>
      <field key="410" subkey="">Wien</field>
      <field key="412" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien</field>
      <field key="425" subkey="">1999, September</field>
      <field key="433" subkey="">24 pp., Tables</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien; Reihe Transformationsökonomie; 11</field>
      <field key="461" subkey="">Transition Economics Series</field>
      <field key="517" subkey="c">from the Table of Contents: Introduction; Method; Results; Conclusion;</field>
      <field key="544" subkey="">IHSTE 11</field>
      <field key="700" subkey="">C49</field>
      <field key="700" subkey="">F43</field>
      <field key="700" subkey="">O40</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Economic growth</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Rough sets</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Rule induction</field>
      <field key="753" subkey="">Abstract: Empirical findings on determinants of long-term economic growth are numerous, sometimes inconsistent, highly exciting</field>
      <field key="and" subkey="">still incomplete. The empirical analysis was almost exclusively carried out by standard econometrics. This study compares</field>
      <field key="res" subkey="u">lts gained by cross-country regressions as reported in the literature with those gained by the rough sets theory and rule</field>
      <field key="ind" subkey="u">ction. The main advantages of using rough sets are being able to classify classes and to discretize. Thus, we do not have to</field>
      <field key="dea" subkey="l">with distributional, independence, (log-)linearity, and many other assumptions, but can keep the data as they are. The main</field>
      <field key="dif" subkey="f">erence between regression results and rough sets is that most education and human capital indicators can belabeled as robust</field>
      <field key="att" subkey="r">ibutes. In addition, we find that political indicators enter in a non-linear fashion with respect to growth.;</field>
    </SEQUENTIAL>
  </section>
Servertime: 0.087 sec | Clienttime: sec