<section name="raw">
    <SEQUENTIAL>
      <record key="001" att1="001" value="LIB910166204" att2="LIB910166204">001   LIB910166204</record>
      <field key="037" subkey="x">deutsch</field>
      <field key="050" subkey="x">Forschungsbericht</field>
      <field key="076" subkey="">Politikwissenschaft</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_46.pdf</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">Sauer, Birgit, Geschlecht, Emotion und Politik (pdf)</field>
      <field key="100" subkey="">Sauer, Birgit</field>
      <field key="103" subkey="">Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Wien</field>
      <field key="331" subkey="">Geschlecht, Emotion und Politik</field>
      <field key="403" subkey="">1. Aufl.</field>
      <field key="410" subkey="">Wien</field>
      <field key="412" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien</field>
      <field key="425" subkey="">1997, Juli</field>
      <field key="433" subkey="">20 S.</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien; Reihe Politikwissenschaft; 46</field>
      <field key="461" subkey="">Political Science Series</field>
      <field key="517" subkey="c">aus dem Inhaltsverzeichnis: Gefühlsblindheit der Frauenforschung; Von der "Politik der Subjektivität" zur "Intimisierung von</field>
      <field key="Öf" subkey="f">entlichkeit": Thematisierung von Gefühlen in Frauenbewegung und Frauenforschung; Emotion und Geschlecht: Diskurse der</field>
      <field key="bü" subkey="r">gerlichen Moderne; Gefühl und Geschlecht als Strukturkategorien von Politik. Skizze einer geschlechterkritischen Politologie</field>
      <field key="von" subkey="">Emotionen; Kurzes abschließendes Plädoyer;</field>
      <field key="544" subkey="">IHSPW 46</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Emotion</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Gender</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Politics</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Foucault</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Weber</field>
      <field key="753" subkey="">Abstract: The women's movement and feminism tend to intimize, to destructure and therefore to depolitizise the public sphere.</field>
      <field key="Thi" subkey="s">accusation is quite popular in the german speaking feminist academic community. What happened to the politics of</field>
      <field key="sub" subkey="j">ectivity, to the feminist political strategy of overcoming the split between public and privat as well as rationality and</field>
      <field key="emo" subkey="t">ion? I argue that feminist political science as well as malestream political science is "emotionblind". This means that</field>
      <field key="emo" subkey="t">ions are treated as forms of perception, of acting and evaluation that are different from political perceptions and political</field>
      <field key="act" subkey="i">on. Emotions are outside of the political space - either making the field of politics chaotic (malestream political science)</field>
      <field key="or" subkey="c">onzeptualized as a means to feminize and humanize politics (some feminist approaches to female political partizipation).</field>
      <field key="The" subkey="s">e contradicting appraisals of emotion, gender and politics is putting the connection of gender, emotion and politics on the</field>
      <field key="age" subkey="n">da of feminist political theory. I suggest an approach which conceptualizes emotion as socially and politically constructed.</field>
      <field key="The" subkey="">recent notion of emotion was constructed at the same point in history as gender, with the formation of the capitalist state</field>
      <field key="and" subkey="">the bourgeois class. Gender and emotion build a historical dispositive (Foucault) which emotionalizes women and the private</field>
      <field key="sph" subkey="e">re and de-emotionalizes men and the public sphere. The separation of women and men as well as rationality and emotion is a</field>
      <field key="mea" subkey="n">s of control. The notion of an emotional dispositive says that political space is structurally gendered and emotionalized:</field>
      <field key="The" subkey="">dominant mode of beaurocracy - rationality - is the organized hierarchy of male over female as well as rationality over</field>
      <field key="emo" subkey="t">ion. The Weberian seperation of beaurocracy and (charismatic) politics constructs the public sphere as male and seperates</field>
      <field key="&quot;go" subkey="o">d" emotions (Vaterlandsliebe/love for the country) from "bad" emotions (sexuality).;</field>
    </SEQUENTIAL>
  </section>