Detail
Raw data [ X ]
<section name="raw"> <SEQUENTIAL> <record key="001" att1="001" value="LIB909574509" att2="LIB909574509">001 LIB909574509</record> <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field> <field key="050" subkey="x">Forschungsbericht</field> <field key="076" subkey="">Politikwissenschaft</field> <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_27.pdf</field> <field key="079" subkey="z">Jaffe, Erwin A., They Just Don't Get It (pdf)</field> <field key="100" subkey="">Jaffe, Erwin A.</field> <field key="103" subkey="">University of New Hampshire, Manchester, USA</field> <field key="331" subkey="">They Just Don't Get It</field> <field key="335" subkey="">Some Thoughts on Why Americans Misunderstand Politics</field> <field key="403" subkey="">1. Ed.</field> <field key="410" subkey="">Wien</field> <field key="412" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien</field> <field key="425" subkey="">1995, December</field> <field key="433" subkey="">24 pp.</field> <field key="451" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien; Reihe Politikwissenschaft; 27</field> <field key="461" subkey="">Political Science Series</field> <field key="517" subkey="c">from the Table of Contents: An Overview of "Politics"; American Indifference to the Initiation of Politics and</field> <field key="Fou" subkey="n">dation-Building; Long-Term Sources of American Misunderstandings of Politics; Reeducating Americans Politically;</field> <field key="544" subkey="">IHSPW 27</field> <field key="720" subkey="">Political Theory</field> <field key="720" subkey="">Constitutional Theory</field> <field key="720" subkey="">Antipolitics</field> <field key="720" subkey="">United States of America</field> <field key="753" subkey="">Abstract: Once constitutional foundations were in place politics and government were seen as secondary activities, more or less</field> <field key="fro" subkey="z">en in place, in the United States. Rights were not contractual but fixed birthrights except insofar as racial differences</field> <field key="sha" subkey="p">ed the American dialogue. The result is a dialogue that emphasizes future dangers future debts and the sacredness of the past</field> <field key="but" subkey="">has difficulty addressing existent and persistent problems. Accordingly, whether Americans can therefore understand the value</field> <field key="of" subkey="t">he polity or of partisanship is therefore unclear.;</field> </SEQUENTIAL> </section> Servertime: 0.225 sec | Clienttime:
sec
|