<section name="raw">
    <SEQUENTIAL>
      <record key="001" att1="001" value="LIB904562700" att2="LIB904562700">001   LIB904562700</record>
      <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field>
      <field key="050" subkey="x">Forschungsbericht</field>
      <field key="076" subkey="">Ökonomie</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/ihsfo/fo288.pdf</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">marin, dalia, monopoly, tying, and reciprocity: an application to international trade (pdf)</field>
      <field key="100" subkey="">marin, dalia</field>
      <field key="103" subkey="">institute for advanced studies, vienna, austria and cepr</field>
      <field key="331" subkey="">monopoly, tying, and reciprocity: an application to international trade</field>
      <field key="403" subkey="">1. ed.</field>
      <field key="410" subkey="">wien</field>
      <field key="412" subkey="">institut fuer hoehere studien</field>
      <field key="425" subkey="">1991, october</field>
      <field key="433" subkey="">42 pp.</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="">institut fuer hoehere studien; forschungsberichte; 288</field>
      <field key="461" subkey="">research memorandum</field>
      <field key="544" subkey="">IHSFO 288</field>
      <field key="753" subkey="">abstract: this paper sees countertrade as a way by which the pcpes and ldcs extract some of the monopoly profits from firms in</field>
      <field key="oec" subkey="d">countries which are used to subsidize pcpes/ldcs exports. viewed in this way, countertrade is an exchange of market entry</field>
      <field key="for" subkey="">marketing assistance in which the pcpes and ldcs effectively shift the terms of trade in their favour. based on a new sample</field>
      <field key="of" subkey="2">30 countertrade contracts which have been signed between firms in oecd countries and pcpes and ldcs in the period between</field>
      <field key="198" subkey="4">and 1988 the paper estimates the likelihood of such a terms of trade change as a function of the market power of oecd firms,</field>
      <field key="of" subkey="w">hether the goods offered by the pcpes/ldcs in the contract reflect comparative advantage, and as a function of the</field>
      <field key="inf" subkey="o">rmation available in the bargaining over the terms of the contract. the data are consistent with the view that countertrade</field>
      <field key="is" subkey="u">sed by the pcpes/ldcs as a vehicle to reduce the effective price of their imports. by being equivalent to an import-tax cum</field>
      <field key="exp" subkey="o">rt subsidy in the presence of foreign market power, countertrade is seen to rais welfare of the pcpes/ldcs by allowing them</field>
      <field key="to" subkey="r">ecapture some of the monopoly rents the oecd firms are extracting from consumers in pcpes/ldcs.;</field>
    </SEQUENTIAL>
  </section>