<section name="raw">
    <SEQUENTIAL>
      <record key="001" att1="001" value="160965" att2="160965">001   160965</record>
      <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field>
      <field key="050" subkey="x">E-Paper</field>
      <field key="076" subkey="">Politikwissenschaft</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/lib/ep5.pdf</field>
      <field key="079" subkey="z">Avdagic, Sabina - et al., The Emergence and Evolution of Social Pacts: A Provisional Framework for Comparative Analysis (pdf)</field>
      <field key="100" subkey="">Avdagic, Sabina</field>
      <field key="103" subkey="">European University Institute and Max-Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne</field>
      <field key="104" subkey="a">Rhodes, Martin</field>
      <field key="107" subkey="">European University Institute</field>
      <field key="108" subkey="a">Visser, Jelle</field>
      <field key="111" subkey="">Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam</field>
      <field key="200" subkey="b">(Connecting Excellence on European Governance (CONNEX) (Ed.))</field>
      <field key="204" subkey="b">(New Modes of Governance (NewGov) (Ed.))</field>
      <field key="331" subkey="">The Emergence and Evolution of Social Pacts: A Provisional Framework for Comparative Analysis</field>
      <field key="335" subkey="">EUROGOV is funded by the EU's 6th Framework Programme, Priority 7</field>
      <field key="403" subkey="">1. Ed.</field>
      <field key="425" subkey="">2005, September</field>
      <field key="433" subkey="">44 pp.</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="">European Governance Papers; No. N-05-01</field>
      <field key="451" subkey="h">Fossum, John Erik (Ed.) ; Falkner, Gerda (Ed.) ; Scherhaufer, Patrick (Ed.) ; et al.</field>
      <field key="461" subkey="">EUROGOV</field>
      <field key="517" subkey="c">from the Table of Contents: Introduction; Defining and conceptualising social pacts; The emergence of social pacts; The evolution</field>
      <field key="of" subkey="s">ocial pacts; List of references; List of figures;</field>
      <field key="542" subkey="">1813-6826</field>
      <field key="544" subkey="">EP5</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Comparative public policy</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Political economy</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Sociological institutionalism</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Corporatism</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Policy learning</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Policy networks</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Organization theory</field>
      <field key="720" subkey="">Interest intermediation</field>
      <field key="753" subkey="">Abstract: This paper provides the scientific framework for the NEWGOV project Distributive Politics, Learning and Reform. In Part</field>
      <field key="I," subkey="w">e establish our own definition and conceptualization of social pacts. We distinguish four types of pacts with different scope</field>
      <field key="and" subkey="">depth: shadow pacts, headline pacts, coordinated wage setting, and embedded pacts akin to neocorporatist concertation. Part</field>
      <field key="II" subkey="i">s concerned with institutional formation, i.e. how such social pacts come into existence. We outline some standard</field>
      <field key="fun" subkey="c">tionalist accounts of institutional emergence, and critically examine them before proposing an alternative bargaining model.</field>
      <field key="Par" subkey="t">III is concerned with institutional development, i.e. what determines the continuation and institutionalization of social</field>
      <field key="pac" subkey="t">s or their de-institutionalization and demise. Based on the taxonomy of social pacts presented in Part I, we define two</field>
      <field key="alt" subkey="e">rnative evolutionary paths for social pacts (institutionalization and de-institutionalization), and identifythree types of</field>
      <field key="tra" subkey="j">ectory along which social pacts develop (repetition vs. abandonment; integration vs. disintegration; and expansion vs.</field>
      <field key="red" subkey="u">ction). We then outline four alternative mechanisms that may potentially drive the institutionalization or</field>
      <field key="de-" subkey="i">nstitutionalization of pacts. Grounded in the four major approaches for analysing institutions, i.e. the functionalist,</field>
      <field key="uti" subkey="l">itarian, normative, and power-distributional perspectives, this section proposes four groups of hypotheses to be evaluatedin</field>
      <field key="our" subkey="">empirical research.;</field>
    </SEQUENTIAL>
  </section>